Featured · Social
Social media for law firms: what it is actually good at
Social media rarely produces instructions for a law firm directly, and firms that measure it that way correctly conclude it is not working. The mistake is the measurement, not the channel — though the honest response to that is to resource it as what it is rather than what one would like it to be.
What it does do is quieter and genuinely valuable: it keeps you present with the people who refer, it is read by candidates deciding whether to apply, and it is part of what somebody finds when they search your firm by name after being recommended.
The three jobs it actually does
Judged against these, social is cheap and effective. Judged as an acquisition channel it will always look like a failure, whatever is posted.
Referrer presence. Accountants, brokers, agents and other lawyers see you regularly and are reminded what you do, which is most of what referral maintenance consists of.
Recruitment. Candidates look before they apply, and a firm with no visible life reads as a firm nothing is happening at.
The named search. After a recommendation, people look you up — and your profiles are part of what they find alongside your site and reviews.
A distant fourth is direct enquiry, which does happen, mostly in consumer practice areas and mostly from video.
Choose your platform by which of the three you are actually pursuing, because they do not live in the same places.
For most firms the answer is one professional network for referrers and recruitment, done properly, and nothing else. For consumer-facing practice areas with a younger client base, video platforms can produce direct enquiries at a scale professional networks will not.
The failure is spreading across four platforms because they exist, producing thin presence everywhere and a reason to conclude the whole channel does not work.
The traps, including the regulatory ones
Some of these are ordinary marketing errors; two are compliance risks that firms walk into without noticing.
Posting case results. In many jurisdictions past results are restricted unless objectively verifiable, and a celebratory post is still an advertisement.
Superlatives about the firm's skill or reputation, which several regulators treat as claims requiring objective verification.
Replying to a comment describing somebody's situation. It looks like helpfulness and can look like advice, and it happens in public.
Client-identifying detail in a post, including detail the poster considers anonymised but a participant would recognise.
Automated scheduling with nobody watching, so posts continue through events where silence would have been correct.
And the ordinary ones: no consistent voice, months of silence between bursts, and a feed of firm announcements that is of interest only to the firm.
A version a busy practice can sustain
Modest and consistent beats ambitious and abandoned, which is the whole design principle here.
Pick one platform, chosen by whether you are pursuing referrers, recruitment or consumer reach.
Post fortnightly rather than daily. A sustained fortnightly cadence outperforms three weeks of daily posting followed by silence.
Write for the referrer, not the client. Content that helps an accountant recognise a problem you handle is worth more than content aimed at people already searching.
Use individuals rather than the firm account where the platform rewards it — people follow people, and it builds the fee-earners' own books at the same time.
Have one person responsible, and one partner who checks anything touching a matter for regulatory risk before it goes out.
Write down what is never posted: case outcomes, client detail, anything resembling advice in replies.
Measure referrer conversations and applications rather than followers or engagement.
And review the ban list against your regulator's current advertising rules, because a post is an advertisement in most of them.
Social is the channel most likely to be assessed against the wrong measure and abandoned. Decide which of the three jobs it is doing for your firm, resource it for that, and judge it accordingly.
FAQs
Does social media win clients for law firms?
Rarely and indirectly. Its real jobs are keeping you present with referrers, being read by candidates, and forming part of what somebody finds when they search your firm by name after a recommendation. Direct enquiries happen mostly in consumer practice areas and mostly from video.
Which platform should a law firm use?
Pick by which job you are pursuing. One professional network, done properly, suits referrers and recruitment for most firms. Consumer-facing practice areas with a younger client base can get direct enquiries from video platforms that professional networks will not produce.
Can we post case results?
Treat it as advertising, because in most jurisdictions it is. References to past results are commonly restricted unless objectively verifiable, and superlatives about skill or reputation face similar tests. Check your regulator's current rules before posting outcomes.
Is replying to comments risky?
It can be. Somebody describing their situation in a comment invites a reply that looks like helpfulness and can look like advice — in public, permanently. Write down in advance that replies never address specific facts.
How often should a law firm post?
Fortnightly, sustained, beats daily for three weeks followed by silence. The design constraint is what a busy practice will still be doing in year two, not what looks ambitious in January.
End Note
Social media is the channel most often bought for the wrong reason and abandoned for the wrong measurement. It is not an acquisition engine for most law firms, and it is a genuinely cheap way to stay in front of the people who send you work.
Pick one platform, post fortnightly, write for the referrer, agree what is never posted, and judge it on conversations rather than followers.
Key Takeaways
Three real jobs: referrer presence, recruitment, and the named search.
Judged as acquisition it will always look like a failure.
One platform properly beats four thinly — pick by which job you want.
Case results and superlatives are advertising; check your regulator's rules.
Measure referrer conversations and applications, not followers.
